Aggregate Spending and the Terms of Trade: Is There a Laursen-Metzler Effect?

Working Paper: NBER ID: w0686

Authors: Maurice Obstfeld

Abstract: This paper investigates the spending and current-account effects of permanent terms-of-trade shifts in a model where households maximize utility over an infinite planning period. In the framework we adopt, an economy specialized in production must experience a fall in aggregate spending and a current surplus when the terms of trade permanently deteriorate The model thus provides a counter-example to the argument of Laursen and Idetzler (1950) and Harberger (1950) that a permanent worsening in the terms of trade must produce a current-account deficit.

Keywords: No keywords provided

JEL Codes: No JEL codes provided


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
Permanent deterioration in terms of trade (F14)current account surplus (F32)
Permanent deterioration in terms of trade (F14)change in consumption and saving behaviors (E21)
change in consumption and saving behaviors (E21)current account surplus (F32)
Households smoothing consumption paths (D15)change in consumption levels (E21)

Back to index