Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP9984
Authors: Bruno Crepon; Florencia Devoto; Esther Duflo; William Parient
Abstract: This paper reports the results from a randomized evaluation of a microcredit program introduced in rural areas of Morocco starting in 2006 by Al Amana, the country?s largest microfinance institution. Al Amana was the only MFI operating in the study areas during the evaluation period. Thirteen percent of the households in treatment villages took a loan, and none in control villages. Among households identified as more likely to borrow based on ex-ante characteristics, microcredit access led to a significant rise in investment in assets used for self-employment activities (mainly animal husbandry and agriculture), and an increase in profit. But this increase in profit was offset by a reduction in income from casual labor, so overall there was no gain in measured income or consumption. We find suggestive evidence that these results are mainly driven by effects on borrowers, rather than by externalities on households that do not borrow. This implies that among those who chose to borrow, microcredit had large, albeit very heterogeneous, impacts on assets and profits from self-employment activities, but small impact on consumption: we can reject an increase in consumption of more than 10% among borrowers, two years after initial rollout.
Keywords: microcredit; microfinance
JEL Codes: D21; G21; O16
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
| Cause | Effect |
|---|---|
| microcredit access (O16) | investment in self-employment assets (E22) |
| microcredit access (O16) | overall income (E25) |
| investment in self-employment assets (E22) | profits from self-employment activities (D33) |
| income from casual labor (J46) | overall income (E25) |
| microcredit access (O16) | externalities affecting non-borrowers (D62) |