Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP9351
Authors: Jean-Pierre Benoit; Roberto Galbiati; Emeric Henry
Abstract: Understanding the impact of legal protection on investment is of major importance. This paper provides a framework for addressing this issue, and shows that investment may actually be higher in the absence of legal protection. Focusing on the application to innovation, in an environment where an innovator (the host) repeatedly faces the same imitators (parasites), we show that investment can take place even without patent protection, as parasites limit their imitation to preserve the innovator's incentives to invest. We show further that an innovator might be more active without legal protection: it is forced to increase its investment to keep the parasites satisfied and, thus, cooperative. We provide experimental evidence consistent with the theoretical results: in the experiment, investment levels with and without legal protection are comparable, and sometimes greater without patents. Our framework is general enough to apply to other situations such as investment in developing countries, commons' management and long-distance trade.
Keywords: experiment; investment; patent; repeated games
JEL Codes: C91; K0; O3
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
| Cause | Effect |
|---|---|
| absence of legal protection (P14) | higher investment (G31) |
| absence of legal protection (P14) | cooperation between innovators and imitators (O36) |
| cooperation between innovators and imitators (O36) | increased investment levels (E22) |
| investment levels with and without legal protection (F21) | comparable investment levels (G19) |
| absence of patents (O34) | more innovation (O35) |