Does Merger Simulation Work? A Natural Experiment in the Swedish Analgesics Market

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP9027

Authors: Jonas Bjrnerstedt; Frank Verboven

Abstract: We exploit a natural experiment associated with a large merger in the Swedish market for analgesics (painkillers). We confront the predictions from a merger simulation study, as conducted during the investigation, with the actual merger effects over a two-year comparison window. The merger simulation model is based on a constant expenditures specification for the nested logit model (as an alternative to the typical unit demand specification). The model predicts a large price increase of 34% by the merging firms, because there is strong market segmentation and the merging firms are the only competitors in the largest segment. The actual price increase after the merger is of a similar order of magnitude: +42% in absolute terms and +35% relative to the

Keywords: analgesics; constant expenditures; nested logit; ex post merger analysis; merger simulation

JEL Codes: L40; L41


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
merger simulation (C59)predicted price increase (E30)
predicted price increase (E30)actual price increase (E31)
merger simulation (C59)actual price increase relative to control group (E30)
merging firms' market shares drop (G34)outsider firm market share drop (L19)
strong market segmentation (D40)price increase (D49)
merger (G34)price dynamics (E30)

Back to index