Quality Competition with Profit Constraints: Do Nonprofit Firms Provide Higher Quality than For-Profit Firms?

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP8284

Authors: Kurt Richard Brekke; Luigi Siciliani; Odd Rune Straume

Abstract: In many markets, such as education, health care and public utilities, firms are often profit-constrained either due to regulation or because they have non-profit status. At the same time such firms might have altruistic concerns towards consumers. In this paper we study semi-altruistic firms? incentives to invest in quality and cost-reducing effort when facing constraints on the distribution of profits. Using a spatial competition framework, we derive the equilibrium outcomes under both quality competition with regulated prices and quality-price competition. Profit constraints always lead to lower cost-efficiency, whereas the effects on quality and price are ambiguous. If altruism is high (low), profit-constrained firms offer higher (lower) quality and lower (higher) prices than firms that are not profit-constrained. Compared with the first-best outcome, the cost-efficiency of profit-constrained firms is too low, while quality might be over- or underprovided. Profit constraints may improve welfare and be a complement or substitute to a higher regulated price, depending on the degree of altruism.

Keywords: profit constraints; quality competition; semialtruistic providers

JEL Codes: D21; D43; L13; L30


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
profit constraints (D22)lower cost efficiency (D61)
profit constraints (D22)quality (L15)
profit constraints (D22)price (D41)
high altruism (D64)higher quality for profit-constrained firms (L15)
high altruism (D64)lower prices for profit-constrained firms (D22)
low altruism (D64)lower quality for profit-constrained firms (L15)
low altruism (D64)higher prices for profit-constrained firms (D22)
profit constraints (D22)welfare (I38)

Back to index