Matched Fundraising Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP8075

Authors: Steffen Huck; Imran Rasul

Abstract: We present evidence from a natural field experiment designed to shed light on the efficacy of fundraising schemes in which donations are matched by a lead donor. In conjunction with the Bavarian State Opera House, we mailed 14,000 regular opera attendees a letter describing a charitable fundraising project organized by the opera house. Recipients were randomly assigned to treatments designed to explore behavioral responses to linear matching schemes, as well as the mere existence of a substantial lead donor. We use the exogenous variation in match rates across treatments to estimate the price elasticities of charitable giving. We find that straight linear matching schemes raise the total donations received including the match value, but partially crowd out the actual donations given excluding the match. If charitable organizations can use lead gifts as they wish, our results show they maximize donations given by simply announcing the presence of a lead gift. We contrast our price elasticity estimates with those based on changes in rules regarding tax deductions for charitable giving, as well as from the nascent literature using large-scale natural field experiments on giving.

Keywords: charitable giving; matched fundraising; natural field experiment

JEL Codes: C93; D12; D64


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
presence of a lead donor (F35)amount donated (D64)
matching rate (C52)amount donated (D64)
linear matching schemes (C51)total donations received (D64)
presence of a lead donor (F35)donations given (D64)
matching rate (C52)individual contributions (D64)

Back to index