Competition Policy Trends and Economic Growth: Cross-National Empirical Evidence

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP7515

Authors: Joseph A. Clougherty

Abstract: Motivated by the general lack of empirical scholarship concerning the cross-national environment for competition policy, I present measures here of the overall resources dedicated to competition policy and the merger policy work-load for thirty-two antitrust jurisdictions over the 1992-2007 period. The data allow analysing a number of perceived trends in competition policy over the last two decades, and allow the generation of some factual insights concerning these trends: e.g., the budgetary commitment to competition policy in the cross-national environment for antitrust has substantially increased over this period; budgetary increases appear to be commensurate with increased antitrust workloads; yet, the role of economics does not appear to have substantially increased relative to the role of law. Moreover, I am also able to provide some evidence that budgetary commitments to antitrust institutions yield economic benefits in terms of improved economic growth: i.e., higher budgetary commitments to competition policy are associated with higher levels per-capita GDP growth.

Keywords: competition policy; growth; policy trends

JEL Codes: C23; K21; L40; O40


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
Antitrust budgets have grown more robustly than national economies (L49)Stronger commitment to competition policy (L49)
Increases in antitrust budgets (L49)Increased workloads for antitrust authorities (L49)
Ratio of economists to lawyers (K00)Complexity in competition policy (L49)
Increased budgetary commitments to competition policy (L49)Higher per capita GDP growth (O49)
One standard deviation increase in antitrust budget (L49)Average increase in economic growth (O49)

Back to index