The Political Economy of Redistribution in the US in the Aftermath of World War II and the Delayed Impacts of the Great Depression: Evidence and Theory

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP7501

Authors: Roel Beetsma; Alex Cukierman; Massimo Giuliodori

Abstract: The paper presents evidence of an upward ratchet in transfers and taxes in the U.S. around World-War II. This finding is explained within a political-economy framework involving an executive who sets defense spending and the median voter in the population who interacts with a (richer) agenda setter in Congress in setting redistribution. While the setter managed to cap redistribution in the pre-war period, the War itself pushed up the status-quo tax burden, raising the bargaining power of the median voter as defense spending receded. This raised the equilibrium level of redistribution. The higher share of post-War transfers may thus be interpreted as a delayed fulfilment of a, not fully satisfied, popular demand for redistribution inherited from the Great Depression.

Keywords: Agenda Setter; Ratchets; Redistribution; Taxes; Transfers; World War II

JEL Codes: E62; E65; N11; N12


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
Decrease in defense spending (H56)Increase in bargaining power of median voter (D72)
Increase in bargaining power of median voter (D72)Higher equilibrium level of redistribution (D50)
Upward ratchet in transfers (H87)Increase in federal transfers (H77)
Upward ratchet in taxes (H29)Increase in federal transfers (H77)
Reduction in defense expenditure (H56)Increase in federal transfers (H77)
WWII (N44)Increase in federal transfers (H77)
WWII (N44)Growth in transfer payments (H59)

Back to index