Federal Fiscal Constitutions Part 1: Risk Sharing and Moral Hazard

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP728

Authors: Torsten Persson; Guido Tabellini

Abstract: Inspired by current European developments, we study equilibrium fiscal policy under alternative constitutional arrangements in a `federation' of countries. There are two levels of government: local and federal. Local policy redistributes across individuals and affects the probability of aggregate shocks, while federal policy shares international risk. Policies are chosen under majority rule. There is a moral-hazard problem: federal risk-sharing can induce local governments to enact policies that increase local risk. We investigate this incentive problem under alternative fiscal constitutions. In particular, we contrast a `horizontally-ordered' federal system like the United States (in which the federal government deals directly with individuals) with a `vertically-ordered' system like the EC (in which the federal government deals with national states). These alternative arrangements are not neutral, in the sense that they create different incentives for policy-makers and voters, and give rise to different political equilibria. A general conclusion is that centralization of functions and power can be welfare improving under appropriate institutions. This conclusion only applies, however, to the moral-hazard problem and a federation where the countries are not too dissimilar.

Keywords: fiscal federalism; politics; risk sharing; principal-agent models; subsidiarity; investment subsidies

JEL Codes: D70; E15; E60; H10


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
centralization of federal functions (H77)mitigate moral hazard issues (G52)
federal government considering local incentives (H77)reduce risk of local governments enacting policies that exacerbate national risk (H74)
centralized social insurance system (H55)improve welfare (I30)
federal subsidies to local public investment (H54)offset local distortions (H21)
centralization (H77)beneficial under appropriate institutions (D02)
decentralization (H77)spillover effects of policies across different governance levels (H10)

Back to index