Team Governance: Empowerment or Hierarchical Control?

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP6575

Authors: Guido Friebel; Wendelin Schnedler

Abstract: We investigate a team setting in which workers have different degrees of commitment to the outcome of their work. We show that if there are complementarities in production and if the team manager has some information about team members, interventions that the manager undertakes in order to assure certain efforts may have destructive effects: they can distort the way workers perceive their fellow workers and they may also lead to a reduction of effort by those workers that care most about output. Moreover, interventions may hinder the development of a cooperative organizational culture in which workers trust each other. Thus, our framework provides some first insights into the costs and benefits of interventions in teams. It identifies that team governance is driven by the importance of tasks that cannot be monitored. The more important these tasks, the more likely it is that teams are empowered.

Keywords: incentives; informed principal; intrinsic motivation; team work

JEL Codes: D86; M54


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
Managerial interventions (M54)Distortion in worker perceptions of commitment levels (J29)
Distortion in worker perceptions of commitment levels (J29)Reduction in effort levels of committed workers (J22)
Managerial interventions (M54)Reduction in effort levels of committed workers (J22)
Managerial interventions (M54)Hinder development of cooperative culture (O17)
Lack of trust among team members (M54)Lower overall productivity (D24)

Back to index