The Simple Economics of Extortion: Evidence from Trucking in Aceh

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP6332

Authors: Patrick Barron; Benjamin Olken

Abstract: This paper tests whether the behaviour of corrupt officials is consistent with standard industrial organization theory. We designed a study in which surveyors accompanied truck drivers on 304 trips along their regular routes in two Indonesian provinces, during which we directly observed over 6,000 illegal payments to traffic police, military officers, and attendants at weigh stations. Using plausibly exogenous changes in the number of police and military checkpoints, we show that market structure affects the level of illegal payments, finding evidence consistent with double-marginalization and hold-up along a chain of vertical monopolies. Furthermore, we document that the illegal nature of these payments does not prevent corrupt officials from extracting additional revenue using complex pricing schemes, including third-degree price discrimination and a menu of two-part tariffs. Our findings illustrate the importance of considering the market structure for bribes when designing anti-corruption policy.

Keywords: corruption; double marginalization; extortion

JEL Codes: D73


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
Withdrawal of military and police personnel (H56)Reduction in the number of checkpoints (H77)
Reduction in the number of checkpoints (H77)Increase in the average bribes paid at remaining checkpoints (H57)
Withdrawal of military and police personnel (H56)Increase in the average bribes paid at remaining checkpoints (H57)
Distance to final destination (L91)Higher average bribes at checkpoints (R48)
Observable characteristics of drivers and their cargo (L91)Higher bribes charged by corrupt officials (D73)

Back to index