Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP5756
Authors: Alisdair McKay; Ricardo Reis
Abstract: Early studies of business cycles argued that contractions in economic activity were briefer (shorter) and more violent (rapid) than expansions. This paper systematically investigates this claim and in the process discovers a robust new business cycle fact: expansions and contractions in output are equally brief and violent but contractions in employment are briefer and more violent than expansions. The difference arises because employment typically lags output around peaks but both series roughly coincide in their troughs. We discuss the performance of existing business cycle models in accounting for this fact, and conclude that none can fully account for it. We then show that a simple model that combines three familiar ingredients - labor hoarding, a choice of when to scrap old technologies, and job training or job search - can account for the business cycle fact.
Keywords: asymmetric cycles; business cycles; economic expansions and contractions; unemployment
JEL Codes: E23; E24; E32; J60
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
| Cause | Effect |
|---|---|
| output expansions and contractions (P44) | brief and violent business cycles (E32) |
| contractions in employment (J63) | briefer and more violent than expansions (E32) |
| employment lags output at peaks (E24) | temporal relationship (C41) |
| employment coincides with output at troughs (E24) | temporal relationship (C41) |