Persistence of Power Elites and Institutions

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP5603

Authors: Daron Acemoglu; James A. Robinson

Abstract: We construct a model of simultaneous change and persistence in institutions. The model consists of landowning elites and workers, and the key economic decision concerns the form of economic institutions regulating the transaction of labour (e.g., competitive markets versus labour repression). The main idea is that equilibrium economic institutions are a result of the exercise of de jure and de facto political power. A change in political institutions, for example a move from non-democracy to democracy, alters the distribution of de jure political power, but the elite can intensify their investments in de facto political power, such as lobbying or the use of paramilitary forces, to partially or fully offset their loss of de jure power. In the baseline model, equilibrium changes in political institutions have no effect on the (stochastic) equilibrium distribution of economic institutions, leading to a particular form of persistence in equilibrium institutions, which we refer to as invariance. When the model is enriched to allow for limits on the exercise of de facto power by the elite in democracy or for costs of changing economic institutions, the equilibrium takes the form of a Markov regime-switching process with state dependence. Finally, when we allow for the possibility that changing political institutions is more difficult than altering economic institutions, the model leads to a pattern of captured democracy, whereby a democratic regime may survive, but choose economic institutions favouring the elite. The main ideas featuring in the model are illustrated using historical examples from the US South, Latin America and Liberia.

Keywords: de facto power; de jure power; democracy; dictatorship; elites; institutions; labour repression; persistence; political economy

JEL Codes: H2; N10; N40; P16


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
shift from nondemocracy to democracy (O17)stochastic equilibrium distribution of economic institutions (D02)
elites' investments in de facto political power (D72)offset changes in de jure political power (D72)
de facto power of elites (D73)equilibrium economic institutions favoring elites (P16)
change in political institutions (if elites maintain de facto power) (O17)economic institutions favoring elites (P16)
effectiveness of de facto power technology (O33)elites' contributions to maintaining political power (D73)
economic rents (D33)elites' contributions to maintaining political power (D73)

Back to index