Which Simple Rules Rather Than Discretion

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP536

Authors: Daniel Cohen; Philippe Michel

Abstract: The dynamic inconsistency of a government's preferred policy, when it occurs, usually implies that the maximum level of welfare that can be delivered at some initial time can only be attained by constraining the economy to `low' levels in the future. In this paper, we set up a linear quadratic model in which the `best' policy rule which is looked for today is subject to the constraint of always delivering in the future a given reservation level of welfare which in equilibrium is the level that the `best' policy itself offers to deliver. We fully characterize the solutions to this problem in the cases when the government policies are constant, linear and kinked linear.

Keywords: credibility; macroeconomic policy; time inconsistency

JEL Codes: 130310


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
Government Policy (G1) (F68)Initial Welfare (W1) (I38)
Initial Welfare (W1) (I38)Future Constraints (C1) (D10)
Future Constraints (C1) (D10)Future Welfare (W2) (I38)
Initial Policy Effectiveness (E1) (D78)Time Passage (T) (C41)
Time Passage (T) (C41)Decreased Effectiveness (E2) (I24)
Chosen Policy Rule (P) (D78)Reservation Welfare Level (W_res) (I38)
Simple Rules (SR) (C73)Political Credibility (PC) (D72)
Political Credibility (PC) (D72)Welfare Outcomes (W_out) (I38)

Back to index