Do Markets Favour Women's Human Capital More Than Planners?

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP4760

Authors: Daniel Mnich; Jan Svejnar; Katherine Terrell

Abstract: Using micro data on women in the Czech Republic, we compare returns to various measures of human capital at the end of communism (1989), in mid-transition (1996) and in late/post-transition (2002). We show: dramatic increases in returns to education from 1989 to 1996 but no change from 1996 to 2002; no differences in returns to education by state vs. privately-owned firms; ‘sheepskin’ effects in both regimes, which rise over time and are similar across firm ownership; no difference in returns to education obtained during communism vs. transition; no change in wage-experience profiles over time; and similar increases in returns to education for women and men. In sum, markets pay women and men equally more for their human capital than the planners did; all the adjustment occurred in early transition and was driven by market forces rather than private ownership.

Keywords: Czech Republic; Human Capital; Sheepskin Effects; Transition; Wages

JEL Codes: J24; J31; P20; P31


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
Market conditions (D49)Returns to education for women (I26)
Transition from communism (P39)Returns to education (I26)
Market conditions (D49)Returns to education (I26)
Firm ownership type (L20)Returns to education (I26)
Type of education obtained (I21)Returns to education (I26)
Receiving a degree (Y40)Wages (J31)
Gender (J16)Changes in returns to education (I26)

Back to index