When Does Coordination Pay

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP425

Authors: Marcus H. Miller; Mark H. Salmon

Abstract: In a continuous time model of two symmetric open economies, with a floating exchange rate, we find that the pay-off to the policy coordination depends systematically on the heterogeneity of their inflation experience. While monetary policy coordination improves welfare when there is a common rate of underlying inflation, it exacerbates the `time-consistency' problem arising when there are differences. Since the principle of `certainty equivalence' applies to time-consistent policy in linear quadratic models, we are also able to give a stochastic interpretation of the deterministic results.

Keywords: policy coordination; time consistency; certainty equivalence; floating exchange rates

JEL Codes: 133; 134; 325


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
macroeconomic policy coordination (F42)welfare outcomes (I38)
inflation experiences are similar (E31)macroeconomic policy coordination improves welfare (F42)
inflationary conditions differ (E31)coordination leads to inefficiencies (D61)
time consistency problems (E61)coordination leads to inefficiencies (D61)
correlation of inflationary supply-side shocks is high (E31)coordination pays in expected terms (J33)
correlation of inflationary supply-side shocks is low or negative (E31)coordination may not pay in expected terms (C72)
policy coordination (F42)welfare outcomes (I38)

Back to index