Go for Broke or Play it Safe: Dynamic Competition with Choice of Variance

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP4249

Authors: Axel Anderson; Lus M B Cabral

Abstract: We consider a differential game in which the joint choices of the two players influences the variance, but not the mean, of the one-dimensional state variable. We interpret this state variable as a summary of how far ?ahead? player 1 is in the game. At each moment in time, players receive a flow pay-off which is a continuous, monotonic and bounded function of the state variable. We show that a Markov Perfect Equilibrium exists and has the property that patient players chose to play it safe when sufficiently ahead and to take risks when sufficiently behind. We also provide a simple condition that implies both players choose risky strategies when neither one is too far ahead, a situation that ensures a dominant player emerges ?quickly?.

Keywords: Differential Games; R&D Competition

JEL Codes: C70; L10


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
players' relative positions (qi - qj) (C72)choice of variance (R&D strategies) (O30)
leading player (higher qi) (L15)chooses low variance (safe strategies) (G11)
lagging player (lower qi) (C73)chooses high variance (riskier strategies) (G11)
players close in position (x is near zero) (C73)choose risky strategies (D80)

Back to index