Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP4201
Authors: Helmuth Cremer; Pierre Pestieau
Abstract: This Paper studies the design of education policies in a setting of successive generations with heterogeneous individuals (high and low earning ability). Parents? investment in education is motivated by warm-glow altruism and determines the probability that a child has high ability. Education policies consist of a subsidy on private educational investments and possibly of public education. We show that when an income tax is available, the subsidy on education should not depend on redistributive considerations. Instead, it is determined by two terms. First, a Pigouvian term that arises because under warm-glow altruism parents? utility does not properly account for the impact of education on future generations. The second term captures a ?merit good? effect, which arises when the warm-glow term is not fully included in social welfare (possibility of laundering out). The two terms are of opposite sign and the optimal subsidy may be positive or negative. Finally, we derive conditions under which public education is welfare-improving and show that total crowding out of private expenditure (for one of the types) may be desirable.
Keywords: education policy; human capital; intergenerational transfers; redistribution
JEL Codes: H21; H23; I20; I28
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
| Cause | Effect |
|---|---|
| Parental investment in education (I21) | Child ability (J13) |
| Child ability (J13) | Probability of achieving high productivity (D29) |
| Parental investment in education (I21) | Probability of achieving high productivity (D29) |
| Optimal subsidy for education (H52) | Education on future generations (I24) |
| Public education could improve welfare (I24) | Total crowding out of private expenditures (E62) |