Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP3970
Authors: Armin Falk; Michael Kosfeld
Abstract: We present an economic experiment on network formation, in which subjects can decide to form links to one another. Direct links are costly but being connected is valuable. The game-theoretic basis for our experiment is the model of Bala and Goyal (2000). They distinguish between two scenarios regarding the flow of benefits through a network, the so-called 1-way and 2-way flow model. Our main results show that the prediction based on Nash and strict Nash equilibrium works well in the 1-way flow model but largely fails in the 2-way flow model. We observe a strong learning dynamic in the 1-way flow model but less so in the 2-way flow model. Finally, costs of a direct link have a positive impact on the occurrence of (strict) Nash networks in the 1-way flow model but a negative impact in the 2-way flow model. In our discussion on possible explanations for these results we focus on strategic asymmetry and asymmetry with respect to payoffs. We find that the latter asymmetry, i.e. payoff inequity, plays an important role in the network formation process.
Keywords: coordination; experiments; fairness; network formation
JEL Codes: C72; C92; D63; Z13
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
Cause | Effect |
---|---|
costs of direct links (R42) | occurrence of strict Nash networks in the 1-way model (D85) |
higher costs (J32) | fewer Nash networks in the 2-way model (D85) |
1-way flow model (E10) | Nash equilibrium predictions upheld (C72) |
2-way flow model (E10) | fails to predict network formation (D85) |
higher costs (J32) | frequency of Nash equilibrium networks in the 1-way model (D85) |
higher costs (J32) | frequency of Nash equilibrium networks in the 2-way model (D85) |
learning dynamic in the 1-way model (C20) | subjects increasingly play Nash equilibrium networks (C72) |
fairness considerations (D63) | impact on network formation (D85) |