Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP3921
Authors: Edwin Leuven; Hessel Oosterbeek; Bas van der Klaauw
Abstract: This Paper reports a randomized field experiment in which first year economics and business students at the University of Amsterdam could earn financial rewards for passing all first year requirements before the start of their second academic year. Participants were assigned to a high reward group, a low reward group or a no reward (control) group. Overall, the passing rate and the numbers of collected credit point are not significantly different across the three groups. The same is true for the reported amounts of study time. We find, however, some evidence of heterogenous treatment effects. In particular, students with high maths skills and students with higher educated fathers have higher passing rates and collect more credit points when assigned to (higher) reward groups. While reported study time for these groups is not affected by treatment status, these students claim that they have studied harder as a consequence of the rewards.
Keywords: financial incentives; heterogenous treatment effects; randomized social experiment; student achievement; university education
JEL Codes: I21; I22; J24
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
| Cause | Effect |
|---|---|
| Financial rewards (J33) | Student achievement (I24) |
| High math skills (C65) | Passing rates (Y10) |
| Higher-educated fathers (J19) | Credit points collected (A31) |
| Financial rewards (for high math skills) (J33) | Passing rates (Y10) |
| Financial rewards (for higher-educated fathers) (J31) | Credit points collected (A31) |