Adjusting Labour Demand: Multinational versus National Firms - A Cross European Analysis

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP3751

Authors: Daniele Checchi; Giorgio Barba Navaretti; Alessandro Turrini

Abstract: This Paper provides a cross-country perspective to the firm-level analysis of the relation between foreign ownership and labour demand. We estimate labour demand equations in 11 European countries using dynamic panel data techniques on samples that permit to distinguish the ownership status of firms. We find that the employment adjustment is significantly faster in MNEs? affiliates, irrespective of the country investigated. As for the wage elasticity of labour demand, MNEs show smaller elasticities compared with national firms, and very little variation across countries. Cross-country correlations show that the relative value of wage elasticities in MNEs on that in NEs is positively related to country-level indexes of labour market regulation (employment protection, union presence,...). We interpret the results as follows: MNEs tend to have a more rigid demand for total labour (possibly due to a different skill composition). MNEs being relatively ?footloose?, however, this difference tends to vanish as the rigidity of employment regulations rises.

Keywords: employment adjustment; costs; labour demand elasticity; multinational firms

JEL Codes: F23; J23


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
MNEs (F23)faster employment adjustment (J68)
NEs (E01)slower employment adjustment (J69)
faster employment adjustment (J68)lower adjustment costs (D23)
MNEs (F23)higher bargaining power and flexibility in employment practices (J59)
MNEs (F23)smaller wage elasticities (J31)
NEs (E01)larger wage elasticities (J39)
country-level labour market regulations (J48)wage elasticities for NEs (J39)
MNEs (F23)navigate regulatory environments more effectively (K23)

Back to index