Investment-Specific Technical Change in the US 1947-2000: Measurement and Macroeconomic Consequences

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP3584

Authors: Jason G. Cummins; Giovanni L. Violante

Abstract: By extrapolating Gordon?s (1990) measures of the quality-bias in the official price indexes, we construct quality-adjusted price indexes for 24 types of equipment and software (E&S) from 1947 to 2000 and use them to measure technical change at the aggregate and at the industry level. Technological improvement in E&S accounts for an important fraction of postwar GDP growth and plays a key role in the productivity resurgence of the 1990s. Driving this finding is 4% annual growth in the quality of E&S in the post war period and more than 6% annual growth in the 1990s. The acceleration in the 1990s occurred in every industry, consistent with the idea that information technology represents a general purpose technology. Furthermore, we measure for the aggregate economy and different sectors the ?technological gap?: how much more productive new machines are compared to the average machine. We show that the technological gap explains the dynamics of investment in new technologies and the returns to human capital, consistent with Nelson and Phelps? (1966) conjecture. Since the technological gap continues to increase ? it more than doubled in the past 20 years ? our evidence supports the view that at least some of the recent increase in productivity growth is sustainable.

Keywords: Growth Accounting; Quality-Adjusted Prices; Skill Premium

JEL Codes: D24; O47


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
Technological improvement in equipment and software (O39)GDP growth (O49)
Technological improvement in equipment and software (O39)Productivity resurgence (O49)
Technological gap (O33)Productivity growth (O49)
Technological gap (O33)Dynamics of investment in new technologies (O33)
Technological gap (O33)Returns to human capital (J24)
Technological advancement (O00)Widening wage gap (J31)
Increasing technological gap (O33)Productivity growth (O49)

Back to index