Has Distance Died? Evidence from a Panel Gravity Model

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP3500

Authors: Jean-François Brun; Cline Carrere; Patrick Guillaumont; Jaime de Melo

Abstract: This paper reports panel gravity estimates of aggregate bilateral trade for 130 countries over the period 1962-96 in which the coefficient of distance is allowed to change over time. In a standard specification, in which transport costs are proxied only, it is found paradoxically that the absolute value of the elasticity of bilateral trade to distance has been significantly increasing. The result is attributed to a relatively larger decline in costs independent of distance (such as handling) than in distance-related costs (e.g. oil price). An extended version of the model that controls for these two factors eliminates this positive trend without reversing it. However, when the sample is split into two groups (?rich-rich' and ?poor-poor'), the paradox is maintained for the ?poor-poor' group. While not conclusive, these results are consistent with the view that poor countries may have been marginalized by the current wave of globalization.

Keywords: Distance; Globalization; Panel Gravity Model; Transport Costs

JEL Codes: F12


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
Distance (R12)Bilateral Trade (F10)
Distance (R12)Elasticity of Bilateral Trade (F14)
Transport Costs Independent of Distance (R41)Elasticity of Bilateral Trade (F14)
Augmented Trade Barrier Function (F14)Positive Trend in Elasticity of Trade with Respect to Distance (F14)
Low-Income Countries (O10)Marginalization in Globalization (F63)

Back to index