Do Good Workers Hurt Bad Workers or Is It the Other Way Around?

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP3471

Authors: Espen Moen

Abstract: In this article, I study the effect of worker heterogeneities on wages and unemployment within the context of a directed search model. A worker's productivity in a given firm depends both on their type and on a worker-firm specific component. Firms advertise unconditional wage offers, and hire the most productive workers that show up. The resulting equilibrium is inefficient, as the wage premium paid to high-type workers is too high, and the number of high-type jobs too low compared to the output-maximizing solution. This reduces the welfare of high-type workers. My findings contrast with the findings in the literature on labour market segmentation, where the argument is that the existence of high-type workers forces down wages to low-type workers and thus reduces the welfare of this group.

Keywords: Directed Search; Heterogeneous Workers; Labour Market Segmentation; Unemployment; Wage Differentials

JEL Codes: D30; D50; J31; J64


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
low-type workers (J89)welfare of high-type workers (I31)
binding minimum wage (J38)welfare of low-type workers (J89)
binding minimum wage (J38)welfare of high-type workers (I31)
tax on income exceeding low-type wages (H29)overall output (E23)
low-type workers (J89)high-type jobs (J62)
high-type jobs (J62)welfare of high-type workers (I31)

Back to index