Does Geographical Agglomeration Foster Economic Growth and Who Gains and Loses from It?

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP3135

Authors: Masahisa Fujita; Jacques-François Thisse

Abstract: This Paper proposes a two-region model of endogenous growth, which is a natural combination of a core-periphery model a la Krugman and of a model of endogenous growth a la Grossman/Helpman/Romer. Specifically, we add to the core-periphery model an R&D sector that uses skilled labour to create new varieties for the modern sector, while forward-looking migration behaviour is introduced. The innovation activity in the R&D sector involves knowledge externalities among skilled workers. Our analysis suggests that the presence of such a sector reinforces the tendency toward agglomeration, and supports the idea that the additional growth spurred by agglomeration may lead to a Pareto-dominant outcome such that when the economy moves from dispersion to agglomeration, innovation follows a much faster pace. As a consequence, even those who stay put in the periphery are better off than under dispersion, provided that the growth effect triggered by the agglomeration is strong enough.

Keywords: agglomeration; endogenous growth; patent; regional growth

JEL Codes: F12; O40; R11


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
Geographical agglomeration (R12)Economic growth (O49)
Geographical agglomeration (R12)Innovation rates in the R&D sector (O32)
Innovation rates in the R&D sector (O32)Economic growth (O49)
Geographical agglomeration (R12)Pareto-superior outcomes (D69)
Spatial distribution of skilled workers (J69)Economic growth (O49)

Back to index