Appropriating the Commons: A Theoretical Explanation

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP2925

Authors: Armin Falk; Ernst Fehr; Urs Fischbacher

Abstract: In this Paper we show that a simple model of fairness preferences explains major experimental regularities of common pool resource (CPR) experiments. The evidence indicates that in standard CPR games without communication and without sanctioning possibilities inefficient excess appropriation is the rule. When communication or informal sanctions are available, however, appropriation behaviour is more efficient. Our analysis shows that these regularities arise naturally when a fraction of the subjects exhibits reciprocal preferences.

Keywords: common pool resources; experiments; fairness; fairness models; game theory; reciprocity

JEL Codes: C70; C91; C92; D00; D63; H41


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
fairness preferences (D63)appropriation behavior (D16)
reciprocal preferences (C71)efficient resource utilization (D61)
absence of communication (Y70)inefficient outcomes (D61)
communication or informal sanctions (Z13)efficient appropriation behavior (D22)

Back to index