Government Guarantees, Investment and Vulnerability to Financial Crises

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP2652

Authors: Gregor Irwin; David Vines

Abstract: This Paper presents a new model of the East Asian crisis that combines three elements ? multiple equilibria, investment collapse, and moral hazard ? in a single simple account. We locate the causes of the crisis in poor financial regulation, highly-geared financial institutions, and implicit guarantees to the financial sector that create moral-hazard. The model has a unique long-run equilibrium with over-investment as a result of the guarantees. But in the short run, in which the capital stock is fixed, there may be multiple equilibria. If foreign banks regard lending as low-risk, then it is. But if they regard lending as high-risk and charge a higher interest rate, then the costs of honouring guarantees rises, making the lending high-risk and the risk premium self-justifying. A crisis occurs with a switch to this second equilibrium in which the government is forced to renege on its guarantees; the effect is a reversal of foreign capital flows. Whether multiple equilibria exist ? and hence whether the economy is vulnerable to a crises ? depends critically on the extent of capital accumulation and the mix between debt and equity financing.

Keywords: East Asian Economic Crisis; Financial Crisis; Multiple Equilibrium; Overinvestment

JEL Codes: E44; F34; O16


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
government guarantees (H81)moral hazard (G52)
moral hazard (G52)overinvestment (G31)
overinvestment (G31)vulnerability to financial crises (F65)
high debt-to-equity ratios (G32)overinvestment (G31)
perceived risk by foreign banks (F65)interest rates (E43)
interest rates (E43)collapse equilibrium (D50)
government guarantees (H81)vulnerability to financial crises (F65)

Back to index