The Protectionist Bias of Duty Drawbacks and the New Regionalism

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP2559

Authors: Olivier Cadot; Jaime de Melo; Marcelo Olarreaga

Abstract: In a political-economy setting where tariffs and duty drawbacks are endogenously chosen through industry lobbying, it is shown that full duty-drawbacks are granted to exporters who use imported intermediates in their production. This in turn decreases their incentives to counter-lobby against high tariff on their inputs. In equilibrium, higher tariffs will be observed on these goods. The creation of a regional block will change the political equilibrium. Duty-drawbacks will be eliminated on intra-regional exports, which in turn will lead to lower tariffs for goods used as inputs by intra-regional exporters. Evidence from Mercosur suggests that the elimination of duty-drawbacks for intra-regional exports, led to increased counter-lobbying by users of intermediate products. In its absence the common external tariff would have been on average 3.5 percentage points (25 percent) higher.

Keywords: duty drawbacks; Mercosur; new regionalism; political economy

JEL Codes: F11; F13; F15


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
full duty drawbacks (F18)decreased counterlobbying against tariffs on imported intermediates (L49)
elimination of duty drawbacks for intraregional exports (F14)increased counterlobbying by users of intermediate products (L49)
increased counterlobbying by users of intermediate products (L49)lower tariffs on those goods (F13)
absence of duty drawbacks (G33)common external tariff (CET) would have been approximately 35 percentage points higher (F15)

Back to index