Project Evaluation and Organizational Form

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP1888

Authors: Thomas Gehrig; Pierre Regibeau; Kate Rockett

Abstract: This paper analyses the impact of inequality on growth when technical progress is driven by innovations. It is assumed that consumers have hierarchic preferences. As a result inequality affects demand and therefore the incentive to innovate. Whether more inequality is harmful or beneficial for growth depends on the initial distribution. Complementarities between a technical and a pecuniary externality resulting from the innovation process may generate multiple equilibria. Redistribution may push an economy trapped in underdevelopment to a high-growth regime.

Keywords: imperfect information; imperfect communication; organizational form

JEL Codes: D23; D83; L22


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
curvature of screening functions of individual evaluation units (C29)relative merit of polyarchical organizations over hierarchical ones (D73)
decision thresholds are fully endogenous (D79)preference for asymmetric decision rules (D81)
asymmetric decision rules (D81)cost efficiency of project evaluations (H43)
cost curves of both organizational forms intersect (D20)choice of organizational form is contingent on external market conditions and lumpiness of R&D costs (L22)
organizational form influences project success probabilities (L22)polyarchies are more flexible and efficient in certain contexts (D72)
low success probabilities (D80)hierarchies minimize costs more effectively (D20)

Back to index