Schumpeterian Entrepreneurs Meet Engels Law: The Impact of Inequality on Innovation-Driven Growth

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP1880

Authors: Josef Zweimuller

Abstract: This paper analyses the impact of inequality on growth when technical progress is driven by innovations. It is assumed that consumers have hierarchic preferences. As a result inequality affects demand and therefore the incentive to innovate. Whether more inequality is harmful or beneficial for growth depends on the initial distribution. Complementarities between a technical and a pecuniary externality resulting from the innovation process may generate multiple equilibria. Redistribution may push an economy trapped in underdevelopment to a high-growth regime.

Keywords: innovation; growth; inequality; hierarchic demand

JEL Codes: H23; O14; O15; O31


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
Income Inequality (D31)Lower Initial Demand for New Products (L15)
Lower Initial Demand for New Products (L15)Decreased Incentive to Innovate (O31)
Income Inequality (D31)Decreased Incentive to Innovate (O31)
Higher Inequality (Regime ii) (D31)Smaller Market Size for Innovations (O36)
Smaller Market Size for Innovations (O36)Harmful for Growth (O44)
Higher Inequality (Regime iii) (D31)Beneficial for Growth (O40)
Beneficial for Growth (O40)Incentivizes Further Innovation (O31)
Multiple Equilibria (D59)Growth Rate Influenced by Expectations and Coordination Failures (O49)
Expectations and Coordination Failures (D84)Inhibit Transition from Low-Growth to High-Growth Regime (O25)

Back to index