Deadwood Labor: The Effects of Eliminating Employment Protection

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP18553

Authors: Emmanuel Saez; Benjamin Schoefer; David Seim

Abstract: We study the role of employment protection legislation (EPL) in boosting employment among older workers. Our analysis juxtaposes the quantitative employment gains with the qualitative “deadwood labor” problem that such gains entail. We do so by conducting a comprehensive analysis of the sharp and complete elimination of EPL that occurs at age 67 in Sweden, as well as reform-driven shifts in this age cutoff. First, focusing on direct separation effects, we find that 8% of jobs separate in response to the elimination of EPL. Effects stem from jobs with stronger initial EPL (long-tenure, firms subject to “last in, first out” rules), and those in the public sector. Separations appear involuntary to workers, with firms targeting plausibly unproductive (sick) workers. Second, we focus on effects of continuing jobs. While wages appear rigid to EPL, we uncover novel, sizable intensive-margin hours reductions among continuing jobs, and an 8% drop in earnings conditional on staying on the job. Third, we estimate total equilibrium effects at the cohort level, where separations fully pass through into employment to population rate effects, with no offsetting effect from hiring. On a per-capita basis, total earnings of older workers causally drop by 21.5% due to EPL elimination. We validate these local effects by leveraging a reform-driven shift in the age cutoff from 67 to 68.

Keywords: No keywords provided

JEL Codes: E24; E02; J26; J41; J48; J63; J83; H20; M5


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
Elimination of EPL at age 67 (J26)Spike in job separations (J63)
Spike in job separations (J63)8% of jobs identified as deadwood labor (J63)
Elimination of EPL at age 67 (J26)Total earnings of older workers drop by 21.5% (J26)
Spike in job separations (J63)Retirement rather than reallocation to new employment (J26)
Elimination of EPL (F16)Significant increases in job separations (J63)
Elimination of EPL (F16)Significant reductions in hours worked (J22)
Spike in job separations (J63)Doubling of the total amount of deadwood labor (L73)

Back to index