Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP18433
Authors: Sandra Eickmeier; Benedikt Kolb; Esteban Prieto
Abstract: We use a newly constructed narrative measure of regulatory bank capital requirement tightening events (Eickmeier et al., 2023) to examine their effects on household income and expenditure inequality in the US. Income and expenditure inequality both decline (the latter decline being slightly less pronounced than the former). Financial income strongly drops after the regulatory events. Richer households tend to be more exposed to financial markets. Hence, their income and expenditures decline by more than those of poorer households. The monetary policy easing after the regulation is shown to contribute to the decline in inequality at longer horizons, as it cushions the negative effects of the capital requirement tightenings on wages and salaries in the medium run, which represent a considerable share of income for lower- to middle-income households.
Keywords: Inequality; Narrative Approach; Bank Capital Requirements
JEL Codes: G28; G18; C32; E44
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
| Cause | Effect |
|---|---|
| capital requirement tightening (G28) | decline in income inequality (D31) |
| capital requirement tightening (G28) | decrease in financial income (G29) |
| monetary policy response (E52) | mitigation of negative impacts on wages and salaries (F66) |
| monetary policy response (E52) | reduction in inequality (I14) |
| capital requirement tightening (G28) | monetary policy response (E52) |