Pros and Cons of Globalization: Income-Based Attitudes

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP17694

Authors: Assaf Razin

Abstract: Which income group is pro‐globalization or anti‐globalization—the wealthy skilled‐labor or the poor low‐skilled labor? How globalization affect income‐based attitudes towards globalization? The paper addresses these issues in the framework of a small open economy which trades in goods and financial securities with the rest of the world. Income‐based political cleavages analyzedare grounded on trade‐related and macro‐related fundamentals, familiar from a standard open‐economy model. They are: (i) The degree of trade border frictions, (ii) The degree of international finance frictions, (iii) The relative factor abundance that determines the capital intensity of the country’s exports; And, (iv) The domestic savings and productivity of domestic investment, which determines whether the country is a financial capital exporter or importer.

Keywords: antiglobalization; financial globalization

JEL Codes: F00


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
wealthy skilled labor (J24)pro-globalization (F69)
trade globalization (F69)income distribution (skilled-rich benefit, unskilled-poor suffer) (D31)
income class (D31)tax policy (H20)
tax policy (H20)provision of social benefits (H55)
trade globalization (F69)tax burden shift (H22)
tax burden shift (H22)income distribution (D31)
trade globalization (F69)welfare state provision (I38)

Back to index