Should Mothers Work? How Perceptions of the Social Norm Affect Individual Attitudes Toward Work in the US

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP17636

Authors: Patricia Cortes; Gizem Kosar; Jessica Pan; Basit Zafar

Abstract: We study how peer beliefs shape individual attitudes toward maternal labor supply using realistic hypothetical scenarios that elicit recommendations on the labor supply choices of a mother with a young child and an information treatment embedded within representative surveys. Across the scenarios, we find that individuals systematically overestimate the extent of gender conservativeness of the people around them. Exposure to information on peer beliefs leads to a shift in recommendations, driven largely by information-based belief updating. The information treatment also increases (intended and actual) donations to a non-profit organization advocating for women in the workplace.

Keywords: norms

JEL Codes: J16; J22


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
peer beliefs (C92)individual attitudes toward maternal labor supply (J22)
misperceptions about gender norms (J16)recommendations for mothers regarding employment (J22)
information treatment (D83)individual attitudes toward maternal labor supply (J22)
information treatment (D83)recommendations for mothers regarding employment (J22)
relative earnings of spouses (J31)impact of information treatment on recommendations (D80)
information treatment (D83)intended donations to nonprofit advocating for women's workplace participation (D64)

Back to index