Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP17561
Authors: Thomas Drechsel; Seho Kim
Abstract: A large literature has studied optimal regulatory policy in macroeconomic models with collateral constraints. A common conclusion is that agents `over-borrow' and optimal policy reduces debt positions through taxes. The reason is that agents do not internalize the effects of their choices on asset prices. However, recent empirical evidence shows that US firms largely borrow against their earnings rather than assets. This paper studies optimal macroprudential policy with earnings-based borrowing constraints. We reach the opposite conclusion to the previous literature. Firms `under-borrow' relative to the social optimum, as they do not internalize changes in wages, which in turn affect their earnings. A numerical application of our model demonstrates that incorrectly rolling out a tax policy derived under the assumption of asset-based constraints in an economy where firms actually borrow based on earnings leads to a consumption equivalent welfare loss of up to 2.55%. Optimal macroprudential policy thus critically depends on the specific form of financial constraints.
Keywords: financial frictions; macroprudential policy; collateral constraints
JEL Codes: D62; E32; E44; G28
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
| Cause | Effect |
|---|---|
| earnings-based borrowing constraints (G51) | underborrowing (G51) |
| current borrowing (H74) | future wages (J31) |
| future wages (J31) | future borrowing capacity (G32) |
| current borrowing (H74) | future borrowing capacity (G32) |
| asset-based tax policies (H25) | welfare losses (D69) |
| incorrect tax policies (H29) | welfare losses (D69) |