Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP17203
Authors: Helios Herrera; Ravideep Sethi
Abstract: We study how media choice driven by political identity can influence electoral results. Citizens gather information from mainstream news but also from possibly partisan media sources which filter news in particular predetermined ways. We assume that citizens process all information they receive correctly but choose their own media sources in a behavioral self-serving way to try to preserve their political faith/identity.That is, they attempt to rationally counteract mainstream news that they might view as unfavorable. In the baseline setup, we assume that citizens on either side of the political spectrum are exposed to different extents to mainstream news, as in the U.S.case. This endogenous media choice generates an electoral advantage for the less exposed side, which can turn into a sure electoral victory even for the wrong candidate in a democracy. Results are robust to forms of media distrust and are stronger if citizens have biased priors. In contrast, we show that, in illiberal democracies, where the government controls the media, official media propaganda works only if citizensare unaware of its bias, but otherwise backfires entirely without censorship of other media.
Keywords: information design; belief-based utility; information aggregation
JEL Codes: D72; D83; D9
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
| Cause | Effect |
|---|---|
| political identity (P26) | media choice (L82) |
| media choice (L82) | beliefs about candidates (D79) |
| beliefs about candidates (D79) | electoral results (K16) |
| political identity (P26) | beliefs about candidates (D79) |
| media choice (L82) | electoral results (K16) |
| political identity (P26) | electoral results (K16) |
| media choice (L82) | biased electoral outcomes (D72) |