Is the Road to Hell Paved with Good Intentions? An Empirical Analysis of Budgetary Follow-Up in the EU

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP17154

Authors: Roel Beetsma; Matthias Busse; Lorenzo Germinetti; Massimo Giuliodori; Martin Larch

Abstract: We study the one-year-ahead budgetary projections from the Stability and Convergence Programmes of EU Member States since the start of the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) until the start of the coronavirus crisis. We consider first budget-balance errors, which we then split into expenditure and revenue errors. Next, we split the latter two into “base”, “growth” and “denominator” effects. The most important explanatory variable is the GDP growth error: more optimism in GDP growth projections produces more optimistic budgetary projections. This effect goes beyond a mechanical denominator effect on spending and revenues as shares of GDP; it also works through the numerator of these ratios. Our findings may call for delegating the construction of output projections to adequately equipped national independent fiscal institutions. Finally, we explore how independent fiscal institutions shape projection errors. Those with high media impact producing or assessing the macroeconomic forecast appear to lead to actual budgetary improvement relative to projections.

Keywords: budgetary follow-up; projection; first-release; error; budget balance; revenues; expenditures

JEL Codes: G11; G12; G18; E62


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
optimistic GDP growth projections (E66)optimistic budgetary projections (H68)
GDP growth errors (E20)budgetary balance errors (H61)
independent fiscal institutions (IFIs) with high media impact (F38)actual budgetary performance improvements (H61)
first-release GDP growth error (P24)budget balance (H60)
debt-to-GDP ratio (H68)budgetary projections (H68)

Back to index