Partisan Fertility and Presidential Elections

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP16821

Authors: Gordon Dahl; Runjing Lu; William Mullins

Abstract: Changes in political leadership drive sharp changes in public policy and partisan beliefs about the future. We exploit the surprise 2016 election of Trump to identify the effects of a shift in political power on one of the most consequential household decisions: whether to have a child. Republican-leaning counties experience a sharp and persistent increase in fertility relative to Democratic counties, a shift amounting to 1.2 to 2.2% of the national fertility rate. In addition, Hispanics see fertility fall relative to non-Hispanics, especially compared to rural or evangelical whites.

Keywords: fertility; partisanship; elections

JEL Codes: J13; D72


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
2016 presidential election (K16)fertility rates (J13)
Republican-leaning counties (K16)fertility rates (J13)
Trump election (K16)fertility difference between Republican and Democratic counties (J19)
Hispanic mothers (J13)fertility rates relative to non-Hispanics (J19)
politically polarized counties (D72)fertility rate effects (J13)

Back to index