Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP16563
Authors: Francesco D'Acunto; Andreas Fuster; Michael Weber
Abstract: Increasing the diversity of policy committees has taken center stage worldwide, but whether and why diverse committees are more effective is still unclear. In a randomized control trial that varies the salience of female and minority representation on the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy committee, the FOMC, we test whether diversity affects how Fed information influences consumers' subjective beliefs. Women and Black respondents form unemployment expectations more in line with FOMC forecasts and trust the Fed more after this intervention. Women are also more likely to acquire Fed-related information when associated with a female official. White men, who are overrepresented on the FOMC, do not react negatively. Heterogeneous taste for diversity can explain these patterns better than homophily. Our results suggest more diverse policy committees are better able to reach underrepresented groups without inducing negative reactions by others, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of policy communication and public trust in the institution.
Keywords: No keywords provided
JEL Codes: D84; E52; E58; E70; G53
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
| Cause | Effect |
|---|---|
| Increasing the salience of diversity among FOMC members (D79) | Expectations of women and black respondents regarding unemployment forecasts (J79) |
| Exposure to images of female or black committee members (J79) | Unemployment expectations of women and black respondents (J79) |
| Diversity salience (J79) | Trust levels in the Fed among various groups (E58) |
| Diversity salience (J79) | Expectations of white men regarding unemployment forecasts (E27) |
| Diversity among FOMC members (E58) | Effectiveness of policy communication (F68) |