When Transparency Fails: Financial Incentives for Local Banking Agents in Indonesia

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP15714

Authors: Erika Deserranno; Gianmarco Len Ciliotta; Firman Witoelar

Abstract: We study the effect of raising the level and the transparency of financial incentives offered to local agents for acquiring clients of a new banking product on take-up. We find that paying agents higher incentives increases take-up, but only when the incentives are unknown toprospective clients. When disclosed, higher incentives instead have no effect on take-up, despite greater agent effort. This is explained by the financial incentives conveying a negative signal about the reliability and trustworthiness of the product and its providers to potentialclients. In contexts with limited information about a new technology, financial incentives can thus affect technology adoption through both a supply-side effect (more agent effort) as well as a demand-side signaling effect (change in demand perceptions). Organizations designingincentive schemes should therefore pay close attention to both the level and the transparency of such incentives.

Keywords: financial incentives; pay transparency; technology adoption

JEL Codes: J31; D84; M52; O14; G28


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
raising the level of financial incentives (J33)takeup of new banking products (G21)
disclosed incentives (public information) (D82)takeup of new banking products (G21)
higher disclosed incentives (M52)trust in the product and its providers (L15)
increased agent effort (L85)takeup of new banking products (G21)
financial incentives (M52)technology adoption (O33)
signals conveyed by agents' incentives (D82)demand perceptions (D84)

Back to index