Is Environmentalism the Right Strategy to Decarbonize the World?

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP15355

Authors: Marco Marini; Ornella Tarola; Jacques-François Thisse

Abstract: We study how the supply of environmentalism, which is defined by psychic benefits (costs) associated with the purchase of high-environmental (low-environmental) qualities, affects the way firms choose their products and the ensuing consequences for the global level of pollution. Contrary to general belief, a high supply of environmentalism does not give rise to a better environmental outcome because it endows firms with more market power which they use to maximize profits. By contrast, standard policy instruments such as a minimum quality standard or the use of greener technologies leads to a better ecological footprint.

Keywords: Environmentalism; Vertical Product Differentiation; Psychic Costs and Benefits; Environmental Policy

JEL Codes: D11; L13; Q50


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
higher supply of environmentalism (Q21)increased market power (D43)
increased market power (D43)higher prices for green products (Q21)
higher prices for green products (Q21)encourages more consumers to purchase brown products (D16)
increased environmentalism (F64)firms adjust product qualities (L15)
firms adjust product qualities (L15)less favorable ecological outcomes (Q57)
higher supply of environmentalism (Q21)greater pollution (Q53)
environmentalism (Q57)decreases environmental surplus (Q31)
environmentalism (Q57)increases social welfare (D69)

Back to index