Institutional Change and Institutional Persistence

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP15295

Authors: Daron Acemoglu; Georgy Egorov; Konstantin Sonin

Abstract: In this essay, we provide a simple conceptual framework to elucidate the forces that lead to institutional persistence and change. Our framework is based on a dynamic game between different groups, who care both about current policies and institutions and future policies, which are themselves determined by current institutional choices, and clarifies the forces that lead to the most extreme form of institutional persistence ("institutional stasis") and the potential drivers of institutional change. We further study the strategic stability of institutions, which arises when institutions persist because of fear of subsequent, less beneficial changes that would follow initial reforms. More importantly, we emphasize that, despite the popularity of ideas based on institutional stasis in the economics and political science literatures, most institutions are in a constant state of flux, but their trajectory may still be shaped by past institutional choices, thus exhibiting "path-dependent change", so that initial conditions determine both the subsequent trajectories of institutions and how they respond to shocks. We conclude the essay by discussing how institutions can be designed to bolster stability, the relationship between social mobility and institutions, and the interplay between culture and institutions.

Keywords: conflict; constitutions; democracy; institutions; institutional change; persistence; stability

JEL Codes: P16; D72; D74; C73; N10; N40


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
power begets power (P18)institutional stasis (P16)
political elite's control (D72)reinforcement of institutional advantages (F55)
political power incongruence (D72)institutional change (O17)
elite recognition of better interests (F55)transition to beneficial institutional arrangements (O17)
fear of revolution (P26)institutional change (O17)
elite fears of losing power (F52)reforms to placate revolutionary movements (P26)

Back to index