When Does Procompetitive Entry Imply Excessive Entry?

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP14991

Authors: Kiminori Matsuyama; Philip Ushchev

Abstract: The Dixit-Stiglitz model of monopolistic competition with symmetric CES demand system with gross substitutes is widely used as a building block across many applied general equilibrium fields. Two of its remarkable features are the invariance of the markup rate and the optimality of the free-entry equilibrium. Of course, neither of these two features is robust. Departure from CES makes entry either procompetitive or anticompetitive (i.e., the markup rate either goes down or goes up as more firms enter). Departure from CES also makes entry either excessive or insufficient. But how is the condition for procompetitive vs. anticompetitive entry related to that for excessive vs. insufficient entry? To investigate this question, we extend the Dixit-Stiglitz monopolistic competition model to three classes of homothetic demand systems, which are mutually exclusive except that each of them contains CES as a knife-edge case. In all three classes, we show, among others, that entry is excessive (insufficient) when it is globally procompetitive (anticompetitive) and that, in the presence of the choke price, entry is procompetitive and excessive at least for a sufficiently large market size.

Keywords: procompetitive vs anticompetitive entry; excessive vs insufficient entry; monopolistic competition; homothetic demand systems with gross substitutes

JEL Codes: D43; D61; D62; L13


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
Entry is excessive when it is globally procompetitive (L49)markup rate decreases (E43)
Entry is insufficient when it is globally anticompetitive (L49)markup rate increases (E43)
more firms enter (L19)positive externalities created by increased competition (L49)
more firms enter (L19)negative externalities from business stealing among firms (L49)
entry is procompetitive and excessive for sufficiently large market sizes (L11)entry conditions (Y20)

Back to index