Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP14803
Authors: Gaizka Ormazabal; Germán López-Espinosa; Yuki Sakasai
Abstract: This paper provides early evidence on the effect of global regulation mandating a switch from loan loss provisioning (LLP) based on incurred credit losses (ICL) to LLP based on expected credit losses (ECL). Using a sample of systemically important banks from 74 countries, we find that ECL provisions are more predictive of future bank risk than ICL provisions. To corroborate that the switch to ECL provisioning results in more information to assess bank risk, we analyze the market reaction to disclosures on the first-time impact of the accounting change; we find that a higher impact on loan loss allowances elicits lower stock returns, higher changes in CDS spreads, and higher changes in bid-ask spreads. Critically, these patterns are most pronounced when credit conditions deteriorate. Finally, we also find evidence that, as credit conditions worsen, the rule change induces an increase in provisions and a contraction of credit. Our study contributes to the debate on the effect of the ECL model on procyclicality, an especially pressing issue in the context of the current pandemic.
Keywords: Expected Credit Losses; Loan Loss Provision; Bank Accounting
JEL Codes: M41; G21
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
| Cause | Effect |
|---|---|
| ICL provisions (Y20) | future bank risk (G21) |
| ECL provisions (K10) | future bank risk (G21) |
| ECL provisions (K10) | stock return volatility (G17) |
| ECL provisions (K10) | changes in CDS spreads (F44) |
| deteriorating credit conditions (F65) | ECL provisions (K10) |
| ECL provisions (K10) | contraction of credit (E51) |
| credit conditions (F34) | provisions (H42) |