The Macroeconomics of Testing and Quarantining

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP14688

Authors: Martin Eichenbaum; Sergio Rebelo; Mathias Trabandt

Abstract: We develop a SIR-based macroeconomic model to study the impact of testing/quarantining and social distancing/mask use on health and economic outcomes. These policies can dramatically reduce the costs of an epidemic. Absent testing/quarantining, the main effect of social distancing and mask use on health outcomes is to delay, rather than reduce, epidemic-related deaths. Social distancing and mask use reduce the severity of the epidemic-related recession but prolong its duration. There is an important synergy between social distancing and mask use and testing/quarantining. Social distancing and mask use buy time for testing and quarantining to come to the rescue. The benefits of testing/quarantining are even larger when people can get reinfected, either because the virus mutates or immunity is temporary.

Keywords: epidemic; covid-19; recessions; testing; containment; quarantine

JEL Codes: E1; I1; H0


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
Social distancing and mask use (Z13)delay epidemic-related deaths (I12)
Testing and quarantining (C90)reduce costs associated with an epidemic (H12)
Testing and quarantining (C90)reduce economic downturns (E69)
Social distancing and mask use (Z13)reduce severity of economic recession (E65)
Social distancing and mask use (Z13)prolong economic recovery (E65)
Social distancing and mask use + Testing and quarantining (C90)reduce overall deaths (I12)
Reinfection dynamics (C22)amplify benefits of testing and quarantining (C22)
Social distancing and mask use (Z13)minimal effect on overall deaths (I12)

Back to index