The Response to Dynamic Incentives in Insurance Contracts with a Deductible: Evidence from a Differences-in-Regression-Discontinuities Design

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP14552

Authors: Tobias Klein; Martin Salm; Suraj Upadhyay

Abstract: We develop a new approach to quantify how patients respond to dynamic incentives in health insurance contracts with a deductible. Our approach exploits two sources of variation in a differences-in-regression-discontinuities design: deductible contracts reset at the beginning of the year, and cost-sharing limits change over the years. Using rich claims-level data from a large Dutch health insurer we find that individuals are forward-looking. Changing dynamic incentives by increasing the deductible by 100 euros leads to a reduction in healthcare spending of around 3% on the first days of the year and 6% at the annual level. We find that the response to dynamic incentives is an important part of the overall effect of cost-sharing schemes on healthcare expenditures—much more so than what the previous literature has suggested.

Keywords: patient cost-sharing; health insurance; dynamic incentives

JEL Codes: I13; H51


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
increase in deductible (G52)decrease in healthcare spending (H51)
expected end-of-year price (Q31)decrease in healthcare spending (H51)
dynamic incentives (O31)decrease in healthcare spending (H51)

Back to index