Did Globalization Kill Contagion?

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP14395

Authors: Olivier Accominotti; Marie Brire; Aurore Burietz; Kim Oosterlinck; Ariane Szafarz

Abstract: Does financial globalization lead to contagion? We scrutinize linkages between international stock markets in a long historical perspective (1880-2014). Our results highlight that without globalization, contagion cannot exist. However, if cross-market correlations are very high, globalization kills contagion. We show that financial contagion was absent from stock markets in both the period of deglobalization of 1918-1971 and the era of “extreme” globalization of 1972-2014 but was present in the period of “moderate” globalization of 1880-1914. Our results suggest that contagion could become a significant problem if financial markets return to a more moderate level of globalization.

Keywords: contagion; globalization; financial history; stock market; market interdependence; economic integration

JEL Codes: N20; F65; F36; G15; E44


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
financial market globalization (F30)stock market contagion (E44)
absence of globalization (F69)absence of stock market contagion (G10)
high cross-market correlations (C10)suppression of stock market contagion (E44)
moderate globalization (F69)presence of stock market contagion (E44)
extreme globalization (F69)absence of stock market contagion (G10)
deglobalization (F69)absence of stock market contagion (G10)

Back to index