Does Money Talk? Market Discipline through Selloffs and Boycotts

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP14098

Authors: Nick Gantchev; Mariassunta Giannetti; Rachel Li

Abstract: Using a novel dataset of negative news coverage of the environmental and social (E&S) practices of firms around the world, we show that customers and investors can provide market discipline and impose their ethical standards on firm policies. Investors sell firms with heightened E&S risk, especially if they are from E&S conscious countries or hold portfolios with high sustainability ratings. Similarly, heightened E&S risk is associated with a drop in firms’ sales in E&S conscious countries. This behavior of E&S conscious investors and customers leads to declines in stock prices, which push firms to improve their E&S policies in the years following negative realizations of E&S risk. Overall, our results indicate that customers and shareholders are able to impose their social preferences on firms, suggesting that market discipline works.

Keywords: Corporate Social Responsibility; Institutional Investors; Culture; Environment; Corporate Governance

JEL Codes: G15; G23; G30; M14


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
heightened ES risk (I12)reduced institutional ownership (G32)
reduced institutional ownership (G32)lower stock valuations (G32)
heightened ES risk (I12)lower stock valuations (G32)
negative news coverage (G14)drop in sales (F61)
market discipline (G18)changes in corporate behavior (G38)

Back to index