Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP13957
Authors: Christian Bommer; Axel Dreher; Marcello Perez Alvarez
Abstract: Natural disasters represent a major challenge for human welfare across the globe. Given the prominent role of international humanitarian aid in alleviating human suffering, the investigation of its determinants is of paramount importance. While existing studies show its allocation to be influenced by donors’ foreign policy considerations, domestic political factors within recipient countries have not been systematically explored. This paper addresses this important research gap by investigating whether regional favoritism shapes humanitarian aid flows. Using a rich and unique dataset derived from reports of the Office of US Foreign Disaster Assistance (OFDA), we show that substantially larger amounts of aid are disbursed when natural disasters hit the birth region of the recipient countries’ political leader. While we find no evidence that US commercial or political interests affect the size of this home bias, the bias is stronger in countries with a weaker bureaucracy and governance, suggesting the absence of effective safeguards in the allocation of aid.
Keywords: humanitarian aid; natural disasters; regional favoritism; birth regions
JEL Codes: H84
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
| Cause | Effect |
|---|---|
| regional favoritism (R50) | aid distribution (F35) |
| weaker bureaucracies and governance (D73) | regional favoritism (R50) |
| ineffective safeguards in aid allocation (F35) | regional favoritism (R50) |
| domestic political factors (F52) | aid allocation (F35) |