Giglabor Trading Safety Nets for Steering Wheels

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP13885

Authors: Vyacheslav Fos; Naser Hamdi; Ankit Kalda; Jordan Nickerson

Abstract: This paper shows that the introduction of the "gig-economy" changes the way employees respond to job loss. Using a comprehensive set of Uber product launch dates and employee-level data on job separations, we show that laid-off employees with access to Uber are less likely to apply for UI benefits, rely less on household debt, and experience fewer delinquencies. Our empirical strategy is based on a triple difference-in-difference empirical model, comparing the difference in outcome variables 1) pre- and post-layoff, 2) before and after Uber enters a market, and 3) between workers with and without the ability to participate on the ride-sharing platform (car-owners inferred from auto credit histories). In support of our identification strategy, we find no apparent pre-existing difference in outcomes in the months leading up to Uber's entry into a market. Moreover, the effects are severely attenuated for workers with an auto lease, for whom the viability of participating on the ride-sharing platform is significantly reduced. Overall, our findings show that the introduction Uber had a profound effect on labor markets.

Keywords: gig economy; labor markets; unemployment insurance; household debt; credit delinquencies

JEL Codes: D10; E24; H53; J23; J65


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
Uber's entry into local markets (L92)laid-off employees with access to Uber are 48% less likely to apply for unemployment insurance (UI) benefits (J65)
Uber's entry into local markets (L92)laid-off employees experience a 13% reduction in total outstanding debt (G51)
Uber's entry into local markets (L92)reduction in delinquency rates among laid-off employees (J65)
laid-off employees with access to Uber (J63)reduction in reliance on unemployment insurance (UI) (J65)
access to Uber (L92)significant reduction in reliance on UI (J65)
ability to participate in ridesharing (R48)observed outcomes for laid-off workers (J65)

Back to index